Voice to parliament is ‘ill-defined’ Scott Morrison says
Save articles for later
Add articles to your saved list and come back to them any time.
Scott Morrison has made a rare intervention in public debate over the Voice to parliament, warning it will permanently create “different rights for one group of Australians over others, based solely on race”.
Morrison, who until Wednesday had spoken just twice in parliament since losing the prime ministership a year ago, said the constitutional change would have the opposite effect of previous initiatives including the landmark 1967 referendum in which the Constitution was changed to give Indigenous Australians the same rights as all other Australians.
Former prime minister Scott Morrison said the Voice was ill-defined and would create significant constitutional risk.Credit: Alex Ellinghausen
The former prime minister said the Voice was ill-defined and would create significant constitutional risk and “ultimately the High Court will be left to decipher the unknown and decide what this will all mean, long after Australians have cast their vote, with no further say”.
The passionate Cronulla Sharks fan also took a swipe at sporting codes such as the NRL, which have recently declared their support for the Voice proposal.
“This referendum is not a vote about whether Australians wish to support and do everything they can to recognise and improve the lives of Indigenous Australians. We all agree on this, and we can all say yes to this. But that is not the question the government is proposing for this referendum,” he said.
Morrison said his contribution to the parliament debate on the Voice legislation was offered “as one Australian to another”. His tone was markedly different to the fiery speech delivered by Opposition Leader Peter Dutton on Tuesday, which denounced the proposal as a regressive and a radical threat to Australian democracy.
“This referendum is also not a decision for companies, unions, sporting codes or any other group,” Morrison said.
“While keenly interested in the NRL’s opinion on hip-drop tackles and the six-again rule, I respectfully won’t be deferring to the NRL for constitutional advice to guide my decision.”
“Permanently changing the Constitution in the way the government proposes will sadly not change the desperate circumstances being experienced in so many Indigenous communities across Australia.
“I understand that is the hope of this proposal, and hope is a good thing, but hope disappointed will be crushing to the soul, and such disappointment can be reasonably foreseen by proceeding with the government’s proposal.
“I consider that the government’s proposal to permanently change the Constitution, while positively motivated, is poorly constructed. It presents serious and unnecessary risks, both known and unknown, to the operations of the executive government and our parliament, upon which all Australians depend.
“I remain committed to the constitutional recognition of Indigenous Australians and all Australians being treated equally under our Constitution.”
Morrison also argued it was not necessary to enshrine the Voice in the Constitution to ensure constitutional recognition of Indigenous Australians and, second, argued the Voice could be created by legislation.
In government, Morrison rejected enshrining the Voice to parliament in the Constitution, instead proposing to legislate a Voice to government – but the proposal did not proceed.
Morrison listed his government’s efforts to close the gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians, including a partnership agreement to close the gap, $316.5 million for the Ngurra Cultural Precinct in the parliamentary triangle and $378.6 million for the Territories Stolen Generations Redress Scheme for survivors in the Northern Territory and the ACT.
Cut through the noise of federal politics with news, views and expert analysis from Jacqueline Maley. Subscribers can sign up to our weekly Inside Politics newsletter here.
Most Viewed in Politics
From our partners
Source: Read Full Article